Loading

Julia Vase #011 - Heatwave

by virtox, published

Julia Vase #011 - Heatwave by virtox Aug 1, 2013

Featured Thing!

Description

Heatwave
Part of the Julia Vase collection:
thingiverse.com/virtox/collections/julia-vase
Circa 12.5 cm high.
About 11 cm diameter.
Three versions:
Solid - Use vase/perimeter print settings in your software
Shell - Use surface print option in software
Walls - Predefined walls 1.5 to 2mm

Do you like/print our designs? We accept donations:
blog.virtox.net/2013/10/25/virtox-accepts-donations/
Or you can buy optimized prints in our Shapeways shop:
shapeways.com/model/1409456/julia-vase-011-heatwave.html?materialId=6

Recent Comments

view all

I scaled this up by 80% making it 22.5 CM high and over 4 times the standard volume. At this size It took my 4 year old PC six hours to slice with Slic3r! I Thought the program had crashed due to the complexity but eventually the G-code popped out. Print time was 15 hours with a .25mm layer height. This was the tallest thing I've printed so far and the results were fantastic. Thanks for sharing.

Great Design! Printed perfectly using slic3r 1.0.0RC2 / Repetier V0.95F in Spiral vase mode with 1 mm bottom (1 x 0.2 + 9 x 0.1 solid layers), blue PLA, took about 12 hours to print - perfect! Thank you for postng your vase designs here.

You need 2 to 3 walls (perimeters).
2 perimeters hold water, but to be sure print 3 perimeters.

More from Decor

view more

Liked By

view all

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

Instructions

I printed the "Wall" file in Fluorescence Green PLA on an Up Plus with 0.3 mm layer thickness, no support, normal speed.
The green is nearly impossible to photograph ;-)

I am currently printing the "Solid" file on an Up plus at 0.15mm with the 'surface' setting at fast speed. About two hours total time.
This setting results in a single perimeter vase with a thin bottom.
(It automatically removes the top)

Strangely though, the "Shell" file printed on Up plus with surface option does not print the bottom. So Up software is bit funky. This file is for the "Shell" option in Up or the Vase/Spiral vase function in other software.


Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

sherpa_chris on Mar 19, 2014 said:

I scaled this up by 80% making it 22.5 CM high and over 4 times the standard volume. At this size It took my 4 year old PC six hours to slice with Slic3r! I Thought the program had crashed due to the complexity but eventually the G-code popped out. Print time was 15 hours with a .25mm layer height. This was the tallest thing I've printed so far and the results were fantastic. Thanks for sharing.

HEC on Feb 4, 2014 said:

Great Design! Printed perfectly using slic3r 1.0.0RC2 / Repetier V0.95F in Spiral vase mode with 1 mm bottom (1 x 0.2 + 9 x 0.1 solid layers), blue PLA, took about 12 hours to print - perfect! Thank you for postng your vase designs here.

collinsricki on Nov 28, 2013 said:

My question with vases is always going to be, "Will this hold water?" i have printed so many vases that have such a thin base and thin walls which wont hold any water making the vase useless for anything other than dried arrangements.

So oh great makers, does it hold water :)

flow on Nov 28, 2013 said:

You need 2 to 3 walls (perimeters).
2 perimeters hold water, but to be sure print 3 perimeters.

fattox4189 on Sep 11, 2013 said:

What program have you used to make things like this?

virtox on Sep 11, 2013 said:

See http://www.thingiverse.com/vir... for more info :-)

virtox on Aug 10, 2013 said:

Ok, you all convinced me, I will be releasing solids and shells as soon as I can :-)

robertclausen on Aug 4, 2013 said:

Looks really good! How much does it weight?

virtox on Aug 4, 2013 said:

Thank you :-) It weighs about 90 grams.

peetersm on Aug 4, 2013 said:

Thanks for sharing you design with us!
Before printing this, I did think a solid file would be nice to have so I could have a "single wall" BUT now that I have printed it using slightly translucent (ruby PLA and zero fill) I think letting it have a "double wall" looks great. I think the light passing through two walls creates a more interesting and beautiful piece or art. pics here http://www.thingiverse.com/mak...

virtox on Aug 4, 2013 said:

Thank you :-D

JuliaDee on Aug 4, 2013 said:

Very pretty. Nice name, too :)

virtox on Aug 4, 2013 said:

Thanks :-)

MovieGuy021083 on Aug 3, 2013 said:

Took 1 hr to slice and still printing 9+ hr but awesome vase!

virtox on Aug 4, 2013 said:

:-) Thanks, seriously though, 1 hour slicing? What do you use? I need to get a feel for what is out there and acceptable.

virtox on Aug 3, 2013 said:

Oh and what is the average acceptable poly count for you guys to slice within reasonable time?

virtox on Aug 3, 2013 said:

Ok, since demand is great, I am seriously considering releasing the solid objects.

The problem with this is the fact that this would implicitly require you to make a "derivative" and for now I do not feel comfortable allowing/encouraging derivatives.

As I am an artist trying to make a living, I have to be a bit careful with what I share and under what conditions.

Now I really understand that most of you are REALLY NICE guys and fully respect the CC licenses under which these files are released.
In practice I spend too much time chasing after people and companies that do not.

I hate that part of my job as it is preferably spend on designing and creating new stuff.

And as you hopefully understand makes me cautious with releasing new files, and how.

That said, I put up these files here with love for the maker community.
So I will do my best to accommodate your requests.

SystemsGuy on Aug 8, 2013 said:

My suggestion would be to release as you do today - CCnC By A - simply as a solid and a vase version in the same Thing. There would be no need to allow a "derivative", as you are not creating a new object when you are slicing...

Today there is nothing preventing me from slicing and printing this as a solid - but you license "prevents" me from doing anything with it that you've not allowed.

Printed_Solid on Aug 3, 2013 said:

I'd also love to see the solid version. Most of the slicers have some great settings for vases, but you can't really make the most out of them if the object is not designed solid.

Regarding making a living, maybe you should set up flattr on your vases? Not sure how well it works, but maybe it's worth a try.

geoffburns on Aug 2, 2013 said:

Beautiful design!

virtox on Aug 2, 2013 said:

Thank you :-)

DTteacherfromhell on Aug 2, 2013 said:

Amazing stuff as always.

Is it possible to get these as a "solid" object, I.E not hollowed out into a vase? - so you can use the vase settings in various slicers to generate single wall thick prints that print beautifully.

QuentinT on Aug 6, 2013 said:

+1 for the solid as well! I love the entire Julia vase series. Having the solid version would make them much faster to slice as well as print. Thanks for sharing!

Luke321 on Aug 3, 2013 said:

I would also very much appreciate solid versions, there much faster to slice (this vase takes 25 minutes) and you can choose your wall wide by setting the number of perimeters.

virtox on Aug 2, 2013 said:

Ah yes, I got that same suggestion on G+

I will certainly keep it in mind for future projects as in many cases the shell is the easier part to make.

But as these are actually precursors for dualstrusion models I am first trying to find a "wall thickness" suitable for everyone.

Also how wel does this "auto-shelling" work with sharp overhangs?
Such as the bridges in vase #001 - Aqua

villekl on Aug 2, 2013 said:

+1 for that. Solid vase models are easiest to print.

peterparnes on Aug 2, 2013 said:

Beautiful!!!! Thank you for sharing!

virtox on Aug 2, 2013 said:

You're welcome :-)

Top