Loading

CupCakeCNC Wide Version Made to Hotproceed Japan

by Hotproceed, published

CupCakeCNC Wide Version Made to Hotproceed Japan by Hotproceed Nov 17, 2009

Description

CupCakeCNC Wide Version Prototype

platform Size 200*100

Recent Comments

view all

Update to my comment: here's a basic drawing of what I'm talking about. In case it didn't make any sense.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/d...

In the void that is my life waiting for my makerbot kit to arrive, I have been thinking about a way to get a larger build area within the existing cupcake frame.

My idea is to turn the X axis 90 degrees (will become Y axis) and mount 150 x 150 mm build platform to it directly. The platform wil protrude out the front and rear openings at the extremes of travel.

Then mount the extruder on the old Y axis (will become X axis) and mount that on the Z platform.

This results in the same axis layout at the reprap mendel.

Problems with this are:
1. The Y direction internal size is only 230mm, which is barely enough space for the 60mm carriage plus 150mm of motion. Might have to mount the drive motor outside the rear panel.
2. Very tall builds, or any time
the Z platform is moved up, the extruder might interfere with the top frame. Might have to devise a more slender extruder or cut larger opening in top panel.
3. The most difficult problem is that for clearance of the build tray out the front of the machine, I will have to chop the top off the lovely
laser cut Makerbot logo. :-P

You should use mendel instead :)

More from 3D Printers

view more

Liked By

view all

Tags

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

joshua on Feb 3, 2010 said:

In the void that is my life waiting for my makerbot kit to arrive, I have been thinking about a way to get a larger build area within the existing cupcake frame.

My idea is to turn the X axis 90 degrees (will become Y axis) and mount 150 x 150 mm build platform to it directly. The platform wil protrude out the front and rear openings at the extremes of travel.

Then mount the extruder on the old Y axis (will become X axis) and mount that on the Z platform.

This results in the same axis layout at the reprap mendel.

Problems with this are:
1. The Y direction internal size is only 230mm, which is barely enough space for the 60mm carriage plus 150mm of motion. Might have to mount the drive motor outside the rear panel.
2. Very tall builds, or any time
the Z platform is moved up, the extruder might interfere with the top frame. Might have to devise a more slender extruder or cut larger opening in top panel.
3. The most difficult problem is that for clearance of the build tray out the front of the machine, I will have to chop the top off the lovely
laser cut Makerbot logo. :-P

joshua on Feb 4, 2010 said:

Update to my comment: here's a basic drawing of what I'm talking about. In case it didn't make any sense.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/d...

kristianpaul on Feb 1, 2010 said:

You should use mendel instead :)

Anonymous on Dec 6, 2009 said:

nice work! i've been thinking about a larger version for a while now, but didn't actually start to rework the plans. will you share your files with us?

Hotproceed on Dec 6, 2009 said:

Give us little time.

We get ready to show information to release this Wide version.

Anonymous on Nov 21, 2009 said:

You'll definetly want to use PLA for this... From what I've seen it's much less likely to warp than ABS (of course I've only used ABS so other's warps look much better than mine)

pattywac on Nov 19, 2009 said:

Printing 200mm x 100mm with abs = set course for Rigel 7, 'Warp' Factor 6.

that's right, that comment just happened

peter_ on Nov 24, 2009 said:

the reprap has a much bigger build platform -- the issue when you move the table (like the makerbot) instead of the head (like the reprap) is that you end up requiring a build base about 4x the surface area of your table -- so to get a large work area, your machine ends up having to be really large.

that being said, moving the entire toolhead in a gantry-style system can be a little complex (and has to carry quite a big of weight, and be stable at high speeds, and so on...), and so the moving table design has lots of benefits, too. :)

this is excellent work, and i hope to see it printing off
things soon! :) best of luck!

Anonymous on Nov 19, 2009 said:

Ah, you've beaten me to this.
I really look forward to seeing if the makerbot-derived plans can scale up larger, I would love to have a refridgerator-sized one. (Probably not going to be possible without some serious reworking, but it would look pretty cool.)

Anonymous on Nov 19, 2009 said:

I can't explain to you how excited I would be if someone built a refrigerator-sized Makerbot, but it's pretty excited.

Anonymous on Nov 18, 2009 said:

Very close to a design I've been working on. Nice!

Hotproceed on Nov 18, 2009 said:

Thank you.

We evolve from now on.

Top