Laser Kitty

by MakerBot, published

Laser Kitty by MakerBot Aug 30, 2013

Featured Thing!

10 Share
Download This Thing! Customize Order This Printed Tools & Utilities

Thing Info

21075Views 2291Downloads Found in Sculptures
Report Thing


This porcelain cat was scanned with the MakerBot Digitizer Desktop 3D scanner.

The original kitty suffered from a tragic lack of Lasers.

We corrected that.

More from Sculptures

view more

Thing Info

21075Views 2291Downloads Found in Sculptures
Report Thing

Remixed From

Liked By

View All



Laser Kitty by MakerBot is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution license.

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

All Apps

This App connects Thingiverse with Makeprintable, a cloud-based mesh repair service that analyzes, validates and repairs most common mesh errors that can occur when preparing a 3D design file for p...

App Info Launch App

Kiri:Moto is an integrated cloud-based slicer and tool-path generator for 3D Printing, CAM / CNC and Laser cutting. *** 3D printing mode provides model slicing and GCode output using built-in...

App Info Launch App
KiriMoto Thing App

With 3D Slash, you can edit 3d models like a stonecutter. A unique interface: as fun as a building game! The perfect tool for non-designers and children to create in 3D.

App Info Launch App

would be funny if someone remixed it to go ON the makerbot scaners laser

LAZER EYES!!!!!!!!!!!!

Right but MB has them for the digitizer and could toss them up in the store especially when releasing models for them.

Quite possibly the creepiest thing I've seen.

The Ebay link below is for a laser dot not a laser line. The keyword you use on ebay is "Laser line module"

laird - in reply to RSkarl

Yeah, those are a little more expensive, so I went for the 'dot' lasers. Now I am printing an army of sharks....

This is a worthless thing unless you sell the lasers in your store or put up a link where to buy them!

They're just line lasers - you can pick them up on ebay for a few dollars

Wow, lasers are CHEAP! I just ordered 70 lasers for $18. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=140953935882http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISA... . I'm going to go print some frikkin' sharks.

Be careful with those ones. I have some very similar diodes which just use a resistor instead of a propper regulator. Absolutely under no circumstances power them for more than a millisecond pulse with more than 3.0v. 3.3v will burn them out after a few seconds or maybe a minute or so. If you want to make it work on more variable power supplies you could supply their power using an LED driver, like those found on addressable RGB strips. You'll need to configure it to not exceed the power specification of the laser module. Looks like for the ones you bought this power usage is 40ma max, so if you use a driver like the ws2811's that are pretty popular now, that should keep things nice and safe with a wide margin. Plus you can write colours to several lasers in series if you like using only one pin of a microcontroller. ^_^

If you used one of the lpd* SPI controller chips or ws2801 chips, you could control them with two pins using SPI, which is compatible with raspberry pi.

Anyhow, make sure you don't overpower them. I've lost a couple of diodes that way and that's no fun. Where the heck do you even get a 3.0v power source? most of the batteries rated for it seem to be as high as 3.1v :/

Thanks for the research. Amusingly, the lasers arrived TODAY, so cool timing! And thanks for your insights. I haven't done anything with lasers since (long ago) they involved glass tubes and mirrors.

I was (apparently naively) going to power each laser with a pair of AAA batteries, wired directly, which is what it looks like they're doing on the product page. Which ought to fit into sharks.

Then for added fun I was going to wire them up to a 3.3v arduino's digital lines. But it sounds like that'll kill them. Would cycling the power on/off in software reduce the voltage (on average) enough to avoid burning them out?

Perhaps instead I should use a driver, along these lines (http://arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/LEDDriver)?http://arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/... The ws2801 looks great, but it's surface mount, which I haven't tackled yet.