Revised ASTM Tensile Test Specimen

150
Downloads
909
Views
Published on August 21, 2012

Description

Revised from ASTM Tensile Test Specimen @ thingiverse.com/thing:13694

The change for this specimen is an added cylinder on one corner to create a starting/end point for the layers. This tensile specimen is for a current research project & is associated with benefits for anyone who wishes to collaborate by contributing sets of 10 of tensile specimen.

This a specimen for tensile testing in accordance with ASTM D638 "Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics". It is a Type 1 specimen to be made from rigid plastic.

Tensile testing of RepRap printed specimens is being performed at the Michigan Tech Open Sustainability Technology Research Group mse.mtu.edu/~pearce/Index.html. Specific information about the testing can be found here appropedia.org/Mechanical_testing_of_polymer_components_made_with_the_RepRap_3-D_printer.

Instructions

Needs to be rotated 90 degrees to fit on most build platforms.
Tags
This Thing has no tags.
Report as inappropriate

You must be logged in to post a comment.

What was the aim in testing these samples? I'm thinking about running up a few batches of various test pieces to see how prints from different machines stack up as far as their physical properties (RepRap vs Ultimaker vs...). Anyone know of some similar testing done by someone else?

Hi -- The aim was to pull out some concrete values for printed strength on RepRap like machines so that engineers could start to do some real engineering on them.

We still have not posted our results because we are doing a controlled and pretty massive study and want to ensure everything is done right. As of now - the values from our RepRaps are coming in stronger than those published in the literature for commercial machines - so we are double checking everything before we make any big claims.

Do you have some results posted? I can't find results from nobody anywhere.

Very soon - we are about half done.

Thank you! I had just copy/pasted that part from the original description, so I had no idea! It is changed now.