Loading

Parametric Wire Bending Tool

by thegaragelab, published

Parametric Wire Bending Tool by thegaragelab Nov 29, 2012

Description

This is a tool (inspired by thingiverse.com/thing:26025) to help you bend hookup wires of the correct length for your electronics breadboard projects. You can find a lot more detail at thegaragelab.com/posts/breadboard-wire-bender-tool.html

Recent Comments

view all

Thanks for pointing that out,  I've found similar problems with some other OpenSCAD things I've been working on - although the temptation is to make everything exactly the right size objects being subtracted need to be slightly larger than 'exact' so as not too leave thin 'invisible' layers that can confuse the Slicer.

I'll update the OpenSCAD file in the near future.

I was getting some weird 'artifacts' upon compiling, so I changed both of the subtracted cube's HEIGHT to HEIGHT+1 in the 'difference' statement

 difference() {

cube(size = [ plate_length, plate_width, HEIGHT ], center = true);

translate(v = [ 0, plate_xlat, 0 ]) {

rotate(a = [ 0, 0, angle ]) {

cube(size = [ plate_length * 2, plate_width, HEIGHT+1 ], center = true);

}

}

translate(v = [ 0, -plate_xlat, 0 ]) {

rotate(a = [ 0, 0, -angle ]) {

cube(size = [ plate_length * 2, plate_width, HEIGHT+1 ], center = true);

}

}

}

}

More from Electronics

view more

Liked By

view all

Tags

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

Instructions

The simplest way:

Download the STL file, run it through your slicer and print. The STL provided goes from 'skip 2 holes' to 'skip 12 holes' and will print with a bed area of
15cm x 15cm (6 inch x 6 inch).

Getting Funky:

Download the OpenSCAD source file, adjust the parameters at the top of the file, generate the STL, run it through your slicer and print. The parameters are fairly self explanatory (for more details go to thegaragelab.com/posts/breadboard-wire-bender-tool.html).

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

GoolGaul on Dec 6, 2012 said:

I was getting some weird 'artifacts' upon compiling, so I changed both of the subtracted cube's HEIGHT to HEIGHT+1 in the 'difference' statement

 difference() {

cube(size = [ plate_length, plate_width, HEIGHT ], center = true);

translate(v = [ 0, plate_xlat, 0 ]) {

rotate(a = [ 0, 0, angle ]) {

cube(size = [ plate_length * 2, plate_width, HEIGHT+1 ], center = true);

}

}

translate(v = [ 0, -plate_xlat, 0 ]) {

rotate(a = [ 0, 0, -angle ]) {

cube(size = [ plate_length * 2, plate_width, HEIGHT+1 ], center = true);

}

}

}

}

thegaragelab on Dec 9, 2012 said:

Thanks for pointing that out,  I've found similar problems with some other OpenSCAD things I've been working on - although the temptation is to make everything exactly the right size objects being subtracted need to be slightly larger than 'exact' so as not too leave thin 'invisible' layers that can confuse the Slicer.

I'll update the OpenSCAD file in the near future.

Top