Mendel Frame Vertex - Aced
Derived from
Description
[A] 'Low warp, shelled Frame-Vertex' by MarcusWolschon
thingiverse.com/thing:2413 (frame-vertex 6off.stl)
+ Elegant design, uses compliance to minimize warping. Very minimal use of materials (~14cc).
- Poor mechanical properties. Not sufficiently stiff or strong. Would require infilling with epoxy or resin which is expensive. Difficult to print due to very thin walls.
[B] 'Mendel frame vertex thin shelled' by camiel
thingiverse.com/thing:4173 (001010 frame vertex vc2.stl)
+ Structurally very stable. Fairly minimal use of materials (~19cc).
- Excessive warping. Cannot be printed in ABS without a heated bed. Some thin walls tricky to print.
The volume of the first 2mm of a print, is a good indicator for warp. (See image for comparison of design footprints). Design [A] uses complex geometry to reduce warp, but has a moderate footprint due to the solid base (3.0cc). Design [B] is worse than the original Mendel bracket with the greatest footprint (4.3cc). By eliminating a solid base and using shelled geometry, this design has a reduced footprint (2.5cc) and substantially less warping.
Instructions
The part has been aligned for printing on a Makerbot. It is rotated 45° to: minimize the footprint size (- useful if you are struggling to get a flat print bed); maximize the area of the raft printed (- helps further with warping). However, to play nicely with Skeinforge you may want to check the Infill angle doesn't clash (change from 45° to 90° as per screenshot).
Have fun!
Note: This is just a dirty-rude Meshlab hack of Rhys' original:
thingiverse.com/thing:3904
A future cleaner version may be released, but will not substantially change the design.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Great stuff! Do you think you could add a foot to your design? That would be awesome! :) :) :) :)
I've tested a few foot designs. They take longer to print, increase volume (hence greater warp), and require a more consistently flat print bed (greater length of part). Therefore, this is not really in the design 'philosophy' for this version. I would just use a stick on rubber foot that can be purchased for a few cents. If this gets re-done in openSCAD, I will add a foot option. Cheers.
Much Better!!! Thanks alot, I'll get printing some of these tonight!
Could you upload the OpenSCAD file? This stl doesn't load into the reprap host software correctly.
UPDATE: I just replaced the STL in binary (rather than ascii) format. Let me know if it plays more nicely with the reprap host software. Cheers.
Sorry - I just hacked the stl directly in Meshlab, so there is no OpenSCAD file... I will generate one as I learn the software, but would welcome someone else to play with this!
What's the problem with the stl?


Hi. Fair comment. As stated earlier: I just hacked the stl directly in Meshlab,but I will create an OpenSCAD file when I learn the software. Feel free to jump in and provide one though!