Loading

butterfly knife earbud holder for cube

by TigerBot12, published

butterfly knife earbud holder for cube by TigerBot12 Jan 16, 2013

Thing Info

8058Views 667Downloads Found in 3D Printing
Report Thing

Summary

This thing was made with Tinkercad. Edit it online https://tinkercad.com/things/j8dxGhHrqEY

Instructions

Print and assemble!

More from 3D Printing

view more

Thing Info

8058Views 667Downloads Found in 3D Printing
Report Thing

Liked By

View All

Tags

3D

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

All Apps

This App connects Thingiverse with Makeprintable, a cloud-based mesh repair service that analyzes, validates and repairs most common mesh errors that can occur when preparing a 3D design file for p...

App Info Launch App

Kiri:Moto is an integrated cloud-based slicer and tool-path generator for 3D Printing, CAM / CNC and Laser cutting. *** 3D printing mode provides model slicing and GCode output using built-in...

App Info Launch App
KiriMoto Thing App

With 3D Slash, you can edit 3d models like a stonecutter. A unique interface: as fun as a building game! The perfect tool for non-designers and children to create in 3D.

App Info Launch App

its funny how you can go from sneakypoos page to this one. back and forth from tab back to tab and there is literally zero difference.

The only change u made was the name and took ownership, it still does not work in butterfly style.

No, I didn't copy. I got the Idea from sneaky poo,but I made it into my own design. I also made lots of changes to this so it could fit the cube printer. I made a deeper earbud holder, curved the shell more so it could fit the core. I also made the holes that connect to the core fit with the shell pieces.

Complete.bloody.bullshit. They are identical (remember, I have the originals so I can actually check). If you had actually done SOMETHING it would be one thing but just copying someone else's work... I mean, what was the point?

It is NOT deeper. The shells are NOT more curved. The holes are NOT changed and work just fine in the original as evident by tons of copies being made.

Also, the licence on this thing is incorrect.

So... what did you change compared to my original? Just copying someone's work is pretty weak.

What the purpose of copying something already done ? no inventivity, only the redoing with thinkercad ?

Top