Flatbottom Honeysphere

by JamieLaing, published

Flatbottom Honeysphere by JamieLaing Jan 23, 2013

Thing Info

2963Views 1195Downloads Found in Biology
Report Thing


Looking at the stretchlet, I started doing some experiments printing things that have very thin walls. For this object I used a honeycomb structure to fill out a sphere, and I made the bottom flat so it would print.

What I like about this print is how it fails. The overhangs are pretty much impossible, but through perseverance the honeycomb design eventually overcomes all obstacles. I thought this was a good metaphor for perseverance in everyday life (mistakes can be built on to achieve success), and I was also reminded that wasp nests and beehives embrace imperfection.


Before you print, flip the STL over so the flat side is on the bottom. I also added "Honeysphere Half.stl" in case you don't want to check out how it recovers from the droopy stuff. You could probably glue two halves together to make a sphere without a flat bottom.

I printed on a Replicator 2 using a higher print temperature than standard (260C instead of 230C).

More from Biology

view more

Thing Info

2963Views 1195Downloads Found in Biology
Report Thing

Liked By

View All

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

All Apps

This extension connects Thingiverse with Makeprintable, a cloud-based mesh repair service that analyzes, validates and repairs most common mesh errors that can occur when preparing a 3D design file...

App Info Launch App

Kiri:Moto is an integrated cloud-based slicer and tool-path generator for 3D Printing, CAM / CNC and Laser cutting. *** 3D printing mode provides model slicing and GCode output using built-in...

App Info Launch App
KiriMoto Thing App

So you enjoy watching the process of how the print itself progresses. Is this 3d printing as performance art, or is there some greater engineering lesson you draw from this?

Hi Skovgaar, interesting question. I think the answer is "a little of both." From an engineering perspective, I like designs that are fault tolerant and I find exploring failure and recovery points valuable learning opportunities.