Loading

Flatbottom Honeysphere

by JamieLaing, published

Flatbottom Honeysphere by JamieLaing Jan 23, 2013

Description

Looking at the stretchlet, I started doing some experiments printing things that have very thin walls. For this object I used a honeycomb structure to fill out a sphere, and I made the bottom flat so it would print.

What I like about this print is how it fails. The overhangs are pretty much impossible, but through perseverance the honeycomb design eventually overcomes all obstacles. I thought this was a good metaphor for perseverance in everyday life (mistakes can be built on to achieve success), and I was also reminded that wasp nests and beehives embrace imperfection.

Recent Comments

view all

Hi Skovgaar, interesting question. I think the answer is "a little of both." From an engineering perspective, I like designs that are fault tolerant and I find exploring failure and recovery points valuable learning opportunities.

So you enjoy watching the process of how the print itself progresses. Is this 3d printing as performance art, or is there some greater engineering lesson you draw from this?

More from Biology

view more

Liked By

view all

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

Instructions

Before you print, flip the STL over so the flat side is on the bottom. I also added "Honeysphere Half.stl" in case you don't want to check out how it recovers from the droopy stuff. You could probably glue two halves together to make a sphere without a flat bottom.

I printed on a Replicator 2 using a higher print temperature than standard (260C instead of 230C).

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

skovgaar on Jan 23, 2013 said:

So you enjoy watching the process of how the print itself progresses. Is this 3d printing as performance art, or is there some greater engineering lesson you draw from this?

JamieLaing on Jan 23, 2013 said:

Hi Skovgaar, interesting question. I think the answer is "a little of both." From an engineering perspective, I like designs that are fault tolerant and I find exploring failure and recovery points valuable learning opportunities.

Top