Loading

Large fluidic vortex diode

by mymakerblog, published

Large fluidic vortex diode by mymakerblog May 31, 2013

Description

My first attempt at a vortex diode just kind of worked:http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:96480

But I wanted better. So I more than doubled the radius.

Properties:blowing in one direction is harder than the other. You can find out more at my blog:

http://mymakerblog.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/fluidic-diodetrials-and-tribulations/

Recent Comments

view all

Nope. I "semiconductors". Far less complex, I'm sure.

Patented:

US 20040031249 A1,

US 7384439,

US 20050279061,

US 20070157587

by John L. Broughton

Authorized use of it is by Rolls-Royce (PLC) as of Jul 15, 2003. I advise you make sure you aren't in violation before someone who needs money finds it and you end up getting sued. You may have designed the mesh, but the physical device is supposed to be under rights. Which I believe you may have violated when you printed it. This is different from Copyright on artwork. though this is still intellectual property, its a gray area and I would be careful or take it down for now to be safe. Remember, this is public.

They already have one. Also, this is simply an industrial exhaust design used in catalyzing reactions with platinum screens or to depressurize exhaust for a reaction before expelling it. Im not sure what you had in mind but I get the feeling you don't "science"...? :(

More from Mechanical Toys

view more

Liked By

view all

Tags

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag. Print Thing Tag

Instructions

So the picture is a bit wonky because I forgot the mouth piece in the top piece. That problem is fixed in the current version. The print comes in two pieces and you have to glue them together.

Patented:

US 20040031249 A1,

US 7384439,

US 20050279061,

US 20070157587

by John L. Broughton

Authorized use of it is by Rolls-Royce (PLC) as of Jul 15, 2003. I advise you make sure you aren't in violation before someone who needs money finds it and you end up getting sued. You may have designed the mesh, but the physical device is supposed to be under rights. Which I believe you may have violated when you printed it. This is different from Copyright on artwork. though this is still intellectual property, its a gray area and I would be careful or take it down for now to be safe. Remember, this is public.

This comment has been deleted.

A fluidic vortex diode? Can't wait till people are publishing flux capacitor designs!

They already have one. Also, this is simply an industrial exhaust design used in catalyzing reactions with platinum screens or to depressurize exhaust for a reaction before expelling it. Im not sure what you had in mind but I get the feeling you don't "science"...? :(

Nope. I "semiconductors". Far less complex, I'm sure.

Top