Hey! This thing is still a Work in Progress. Files, instructions, and other stuff might change!

Sehome Swerve Drive 2

by LoboCNC Dec 1, 2017
Download All Files

Thing Apps Enabled

Please Login to Comment

Great job! Any chance to get an stp file?

I'll see about posting STEP files when I get a chance. In the meantime, the Solidworks (2011) files are included in the ZIP file and you should be able to convert those to STEP if you have any access to Solidworks.

Thanks! I was able to convert the files using Grabcad. BTW which lengths of belts are used?

The belts are specified in the list of purchased parts, along with all of the other bearings, fasteners, etc.

This looks great, our team is going for something simpler. last year we just used the drivetrain that comes in the kit but this year we are trying to make our own west coast drivetrain. But again nice work, super impressed.

Where did you buy your belts?

I got them from Stock Drive Products (https://shop.sdp-si.com/catalog). You might also be able to get them from Misumi (https://us.misumi-ec.com/vona2/detail/110302652150/).

Comments deleted.

VERY nice work!! Thanks for sharing.

I have been considering a very similar design. The biggest potential issue, with the quarter turn belt approach, is the excessive wear on the synchronous belt. It appears you are using a GT3 6mm wide by 3mm pitch belt (I did not notice in your parts list the belt width). Have you run these drives, or your previous design, enough to result in belt failure?


Unfortunately we haven't done a huge amount of testing so far because our FRC team decided to go with a different drive system this year. I fatigue on the belt is directly related to the load on the belt (pre-load plus dynamic load). Both of these can be minimize if the mass of the robot being driven is lowered. My gut feeling, though, is that for an FRC competition robot, which only gets run for a few hours to 10's of hours total, belt failure will not be a problem, and if there is the occasional belt failure, they are easy (and relatively cheap) to replace. The bigger limitation is the torque that can be delivered through the relatively tiny 6mm wide, 3mm pitch belt before the teeth start to skip on the small pulley.

Thanks for the extra details. My immediate applications are mostly interactive roaming robots to perform within crowds, such as museums and stores. Low speed and gentle navigation would be the typical operation, lending to less stress on the belts, but if this could still result in changing belts every 10 or 20 hours, that would be a drag.

With the limited testing, did you find a lot of ratcheting (slipping teeth)?

If so, what weight of robot were you moving?

I am trying to determine if using four swerve drives of similar design on fairly light robots (maybe up to 60 lbs with lower anticipated operating speeds to achieve maximum around 6 mph) would be within a safe margin. I need to make sure I am not backwards on my calculations, but from some of the documentation on the GT3 belts and pulleys, I think this is possibly within the far reach of achievable.

Thanks again.

With a 60 lb robot with low speeds and low accelerations, I don't think you'd have any problems with the belts. We haven't had any problem with skipping teeth. The trick is to set the pre-load just high enough to cover the needed accelerations but no higher. That will minimize the stress on the core fibers on the outer edges of the belt. Your other option would be to use urethane belts with a kevlar core. They are more flexible and would be much less prone to failure, and the small loss of stiffness would not be a big issue for your application.

Where is the video about this ?

Armadillo has great properties, but it's stupidly expensive. It's approximately 4x more than pla.

What would be worth trying is flexible pla. The cheapest generic stuff tends to be at the stiffer end and virtually indestructible, while being pretty close to decent pla in price.

why is it called a swerve drive ?

I don't want to derail the conversation, but you intrigued me. I'm always on the hunt for different materials with different properties, but I do get tired of the high price of the exotics. I'd love something less crystal-brittle than PLA (but still as easy to print -- no enclosure means ABS is generally a pain) that was also sanely priced for general use. The "flexible PLA" sounds good, but I'm curious what it actually is. Quick Amazon search turned up something (WYZworks Soft Flexible PLA) claiming to be flexible PLA with 85A Shore hardness, which is NinjaFlex territory (so I suspect that it is really TPU, possible with just enough PLA in it for marketing purposes?). I can print that fine, but it sounded like you were talking about something stiffer than that. Maybe some of the "PLA Plus" materials? Do you have links to stuff that's worked well for you in the past?

Esun flexible pla is about twice as stiff as polyflex. The one i'm currently using is sienoc flexible pla. £23 a kg. Which is at least as good as polyflex, but a good bit cheaper.
the esun cost a bit more but is noticeably stiffer,

No clue on shore hardness, the random mix of letters and numbers doesn't make much sense to me. :-)


However, on the bearing - https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007HS0MHO/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1 is nearly the same size as the one you're using. It has far more load capacity than you'd likely need for far heavier robots. Would require some futzing with the design to incorporate.

You could also use the printable slew ring https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2375124

I've also always been a fan of the FRC16 style bearing set up with a ball groove on the bottom and a top piece with nylon as a bushing surface. The bottom balls provide bearing functionality and the top nylon provides retention. Let's you have more material retaining the balls.

Any chance of discussing how you found the belt path? I'm going out on a limb and saying SW 3d curve and path length constraint?

Slew Bearing, parametric Design with Fusion 360

Thanks for the tip on the thin section bearing - only $16! Last time I bought one of those (maybe 20 years ago) it was several hundred dollars. (The miracles of Chinese manufacturing.) I may need a slightly smaller OD, but I can probably find a 60mm ID bearing that would still leave me enough room for mounting hardware for the inner race.

As for the belt path, I just laid that out using multiple planes that all lie on the centerline of the belt. To sort out the length, I didn't use any sort of path length constraint (I'm not much of a Solidworks wiz) - just a little trial and error.

Yeah that manufacturer makes a bunch of them. I just grabbed the one I had sitting around. If you were ordering a bunch of them I'd suggest finding your preferred far east reseller since they are even cheaper there but you tend to need to wait a couple weeks.

Dam, This thing is amazing !

What a really nicely engineered part. The quality of design is just obvious. If I build another robot I may build this.

How does the airsoft beeb bearing compare to something off the shelf? Is it a big compromise in quality compared to a similar sized cheap commercial bearing?

The 3D printed bearing with airsoft BB's is certainly accurate enough for this application, but the big worry is that it will break during impact with another robot (or a wall). Unfortunately, commercial large bore slew bearings like this, that are very flat and with mounting holes, are generally non-stock items and very expensive. My other swerve drive design, https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1135618, uses a custom machined split-race bearing. When I get a chance, I'll be posting a hybrid design that is still mostly 3D printed, but that uses the machined steel bearing instead.

Sehome Seamonsters Swerve (S3) Drive
by LoboCNC

Any chance of a video of it in action?

Once we get our swerve drive code fully debugged, I'll be posting a video.

First off, I have no robot building experience, so take the following with as many grains of salt as needed.

You mentioned that increased traction would lead to parts breaking in a collision. Have you done any experimentation with other filaments, like Cheetah or Armadillo? Both are on the "flexible" spectrum, but both are fairly rigid and print in most stock printers. Armadillo in particular is designed to be tough -- it's really only flexible so that it gives instead of breaking. They compare Armadillo to hard hat material. These filaments do cost more than PLA, but if one "unbreakable" (yah, I know, no such thing) assembly in Armadillo replaces 2-3 spare PLA assemblies, the economics might work out in your favor (plus fewer breakdowns in competition).

I was initially thinking that something like NinjaFlex might be useful for the wheels for traction, but honestly, NinjaFlex is pretty slick (has to be, to slide through all the tubes and things necessary to print it), so there's probably no gain to be had on that front. I made a NinjaFlex glove for halloween (HellBoy) and it was really hard to hold things because the surface was as slick as PLA.

As a side note: I know that Makers Muse used PC Max polycarbonate for some gears in one of his battle bots and was very happy. I have absolutely no experience with polycarbonate printing, myself, though I do know that it requires a somewhat special printer to pull it off...

(No, I don't have any association with Fenner Drives / NinjaFlex. But I have been impressed with how tough their material is. Makes sense, given that they made custom drive belts before they got into filament work, so they have some material engineering experience.)

Thanks for the tip on using Armadillo filament. I hadn't heard of this, but it looks like it prints and reasonable temperatures, has low shrinkage (warping), and is actually a little stiffer than PLA (important for structural parts). It's yield strength is not as high as PLA, but the added toughness may make up for that. It's main drawback, though, might be it's heat deflection temperature which appears to be lower than that for PLA. Polycarbonate would be a great material, however its high printing temperature and greater shrinkage make it more difficult for the uninitiated to print with. We'll be doing more testing with the PLA and see exactly what failures we run into. I've also got a version of this swerve drive that is nearly identical, but that uses the machined steel slew bearing from my first swerve drive, if it turns out bearing failure is the main issue.

what about Hatchbox the TPLA filament? its supposed to be very flexible, durable, and i believe it doesn't warp a whole lot if i remember right. or have you tried this already?

TPLA would be worth checking out as well - thanks!

Very nice. I'm working on a similar project. I'm using printed gears instead of the belts you used in the wheel hub.

Off topic a bit ...Last year you made Soda can holder any chance of uploading it again Orange in colour

Oh yeah - I took that down because there was a little confusion with it being on another site. I'll go ahead and put it back up.

What kind of tools would be required to fabricate the metal parts? Can it be done without a lathe?

As designed, the axle and the idler rollers require some simple lathe work. I'd like to do a little redesign so that axle can be made from stock materials without a lathe. The idler rollers are a little trickier - you could just use a bronze bushing, but you really need flanges on both sides. Our high school does have a lathe, but a crappy one, so I end up doing lathe work for the team at home - thus I'm totally motivated to make this lathe-free.

Great job with these wheels. I'm also without a lathe, having a version that does not require metalwork would make this project far more accessible.

Very Cool, well done buddy.

Hey, thanks!