Loading

Hey! This thing is still a Work in Progress. Files, instructions, and other stuff might change!

Make: 2015 3D Printer Shoot Out Test Models

by MAKE, published

Make: 2015 3D Printer Shoot Out Test Models by MAKE Nov 7, 2014
70 Share
Download All Files

Thing Apps Enabled

Order This Printed View All Apps

Contents

Liked By

View All

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag.

Print Thing Tag

Thing Statistics

131002Views 51629Downloads

Summary

Make Magazine's third annual 3D Printing Shootout was conducted using these files, created by Andreas Bastian to benchmark performance of desktop 3D printers. You can read all 26 machine reviews in Make:'s Annual Guide to 3D Printing 2015 (Volume 42).

These test geometries are designed to evaluate specific performance characteristics and motion systems in common low-cost FDM/FFF machines. Traditionally, layer height has been used as a proxy for resolution or quality, but it is a bit of an oversimplification of what is often termed "print quality".

Prints:

  1. Dimensional Accuracy
  2. Bridging Performance
  3. Overhang Performance
  4. Negative Space Tolerance
  5. Fine Positive Features Performance
  6. XY Resonance
  7. Z Resonance

Instructions

Model Evaluation

Learn how to evaluate the test geometries at: http://wp.me/p22K2I-1TOt

Documentation and Sharing:

Please use the “I Made One” button on your file sharing site of choice to share your results! Make sure to include the following information with your photo(s) of your completed test prints:

  1. Machine make and model
  2. Slicer and slicing settings (layer height, number of shells, print temperature, extrusion multipliers, speeds)
  3. Print time - start with a room temperature extruder and platform. Begin timing when you start the print, and include the preheat sequence. Keep timing through any post-print sequence, like the extruder or platform returning to a homing position.
  4. Filament source

All Apps

3D Print your file with 3D Hubs, the world’s largest online marketplace for 3D printing services.

App Info Launch App

Auto-magically prepare your 3D models for 3D printing. A cloud based 3D models Preparing and Healing solution for 3D Printing, MakePrintable provides features for model repairing, wall thickness...

App Info Launch App

Kiri:Moto is an integrated cloud-based slicer and tool-path generator for 3D Printing, CAM / CNC and Laser cutting. *** 3D printing mode provides model slicing and GCode output using built-in...

App Info Launch App
KiriMoto Thing App

With 3D Slash, you can edit 3d models like a stonecutter. A unique interface: as fun as a building game! The perfect tool for non-designers and children to create in 3D.

App Info Launch App

Print through a distributed network of 3D printing enthusiasts from across the US, at a fraction of the cost of the competitors. We want to change the world for the better through technology, an...

App Info Launch App

Quickly Scale, Mirror or Cut your 3D Models

App Info Launch App

3D Print a wide range of designs with Treatstock. Easy to use tools to get the perfect result. The global 3D printing network that connects you with high-quality and fast working print services nea...

App Info Launch App

Hi. I have Creality CR-10. My print didn't come out as planned. What settings should I change and to what exactly.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/rgZ0Qe9GhGDzdsmJ2

Current CURA settings:
Layer Height: 0.1mm
Wall thickness: 0.8mm
Bottom thickness: 0.8mm
Infill: 20%
Print temp: 200C
Bed temp: 60C
Diameter: 1.75
Flow: 100%
Enable retraction: yes
Retraction distance: 10mm
Retraction speed: 60mm/s
Retraction minimum travel: 0.8mm
Print speed: 50mm/s
Travel speed: 120mm/s
Z Hop When Retracted: yes
Z Hop Height: 0.5mm
Enable Print Cooling: yes
Support: no

These are clearly printer test, not calibration pieces. Chamfers and texts do cause problems unrelated to the tested feature.

Thanks for the link. I'm definitely looking for a new printer so hopefully it'll be some comprehensive results.

Is the Negative Space Test radial or diametral? I.e. - does "0.2" refer to the difference in diameter of the pin and hole (in which case, the precision would be down to 0.1), or difference in radius (in which it would just be 0.2)?

I did the negative hold test. 6 - 4 came out off the bed. 3 needed a little push. But 2 is stuck in there.
What do i need to do to be able to get my printer printing that.

duh these are the makezine people

are theese things supposed to be printed without any support or with them?

How to evaluate link is dead!

Where can I find the actual test prints by the printers tested by Make?

What type infill would you recommend for printing these tests? Hollow or a light infill?

10%-20% is pretty standard. Most of these should be printed with the machines medium or standard settings so we are relying on the settings the vendor recommends.

Instructions link ("Learn how to evaluate the test geometries at: http://wp.me/p22K2I-1TOt ") heads to locked file? Is there anything more than on the web? (www.makezine.com/2014/11/07/how-to-evaluate-the-2015-make-3dp-test-probes/) – I want to compare my test prints (including robot with joints) from MakerBot Replicator with those from the last 3D printers roundup. But if I will use partly different methodology, it will be hit and miss procedure. :o)

I will look into that and see what happened to the link.

The abbreviated link is still leading to a private wordpress site. However, I was able to open the www.makezine.com link that tomulinek provided in his comment.

These calibration prints are almost completely useless without some way of correcting the errors. Any fool can hit print and rate the print but how are we supposed to improve the prints?

These probes are just to compare the machines in a more scientific fashion. We were not looking for a way to tell you how to tune your machine.

The problem with giving recommendations for "fixes" is that this may be different for every printer. Some things can be fixed in the slicing profiles, if the user has access to those. Other issues are inherent to the hardware of the machine and would take a manufacturer (or user created) upgrade. I suggest looking for super users of your machine on forums dedicated to that machine for details on how to get better prints from your particular printer.

True! I wish they had a guide on how to fix it...

For the accuracy/backlash test, I suggest that people report the measured length of the diameter in the X direction and the Y direction so that there will be a clear picture of where different people's results differ.

Including the print time is important because slower printing may increase the quality of a print.

The "how to evaluate" document linked on the instructions page could be better. The document only details scoring in seven categories, while the magazine scores are broken into ten. It would also be very helpful and scores people come up with would be more consistent if pictures of prints and the scores they would get are provided - some of the scoring descriptions aren't all that clear.

I think you should add to the description or the instructions here to include your...
Documentation and Sharing: Please use the “I Made One” button on your file sharing site of choice to share your results! Make sure to include the following information with your photo(s) of your completed test prints:
1-- Machine make and model
2-- Slicer and slicing settings (layer height, number of shells, print temperature, extrusion multipliers, speeds)
3-- Print time – Start with a room temperature extruder and platform. Begin timing when you start the print, and include the preheat sequence. Keep timing through any post-print sequence, like the extruder or platform returning to a homing position.
4-- Filament source

Great suggestion. Will do!

The instructions have been updated. Thanks!

link to Make to request their free download of an extract of their guide, with their "top 10":
http://makezine.com/free-2015-ultimate-guide-to-3d-printing/

Top