Hey! This thing is still a Work in Progress. Files, instructions, and other stuff might change!

Spring-loaded Ultimaker short belt tensioner

by JelleBoomstra, published

Spring-loaded Ultimaker short belt tensioner by JelleBoomstra Apr 27, 2013



Liked By

View All

Give a Shout Out

If you print this Thing and display it in public proudly give attribution by printing and displaying this tag.

Print Thing Tag


Thing Statistics

1983Views 357Downloads Found in 3D Printer Parts


Mooncactus design only had two holes for the stepper motor and two screws on the lug side, over- constraining it.
This design is intended to be mounted on the inside of your UM, between the casing and the motors. If you have and older type UM with the stack of plywood as spacers: you only need to remove one plate. If you have the newer plastic spacers you probably need screws a little longer (2mm) or you can get by with 2mm less thread in the motors?

More from 3D Printer Parts

view more

All Apps

Auto-magically prepare your 3D models for 3D printing. A cloud based 3D models Preparing and Healing solution for 3D Printing, MakePrintable provides features for model repairing, wall thickness...

App Info Launch App

Kiri:Moto is an integrated cloud-based slicer and tool-path generator for 3D Printing, CAM / CNC and Laser cutting. *** 3D printing mode provides model slicing and GCode output using built-in...

App Info Launch App
KiriMoto Thing App

With 3D Slash, you can edit 3d models like a stonecutter. A unique interface: as fun as a building game! The perfect tool for non-designers and children to create in 3D.

App Info Launch App

Quickly Scale, Mirror or Cut your 3D Models

App Info Launch App

Hi Jelle! Actually, I already had uploaded a 4-hole tensioner version for the new independent stepper spacers of the UM (check the first STL preview). Mounting on the outside of the frame makes it probably easier to fine-tune, while moving it inside as you may be better (closer to the belt and the stepper).

Now, if you fully screw the stepper in the end, it probably makes no big difference.
In any case the single hole version is a good idea as I don't know if the spring left enough angular freeplay in my design (not a big constraint I guess).

Also I like the shape of your thing :)